Print Page

Qudrat, A. (2012). "The Islamic Middle Ages, a Fractured Polity, and the Flourishing of a Cultural and Scientific Renaissance." Student Pulse, 4(09). Retrieved from

The Islamic Middle Ages, a Fractured Polity, and the Flourishing of a Cultural and Scientific Renaissance

By Anam Qudrat
2012, Vol. 4 No. 09

Ibn Khaldun highlighted that societies in their natural state exist in the rural countryside, where the struggle of daily life binds kinsmen together (Abdullah, 2012a). Defining this strong familial bond as “asabiyya,” he stated that eventually this bond of zealous loyalty to one’s brethren becomes the driving force behind conquest (Abdullah, 2012a). However, after conquest, as time passes and individuals delve in their material gains and elitist dispositions, the once impeachable bond of asabiyya begins to disintegrate. At this stage, fragmentation of the state is inevitable, leading to eventual collapse. The Islamic Middle Ages were a time period when the Abbasid dynasty had reached this stage. Nevertheless, despite increasing political fragmentation, insecurity and economic decline, the Middle Ages paradoxically witnessed the flourishing of cultural and scientific production due to the populace gaining political independence, coupled with a strong sense of social unity at the grassroots level.

The population gained political independence primarily as the role of the government was transformed from a watchdog to a passive authority struggling for stability. Initially the government’s role was to establish an Islamic state based on the Quran and Sunnah according to the vision of the Prophet, but this ideal never materialized over time. While the Abbasids and Alids may have opted for this plan, the dynasts of the Middle Ages did not have the same vision. They, in pursuit of preserving their gains, defined the government’s role as primarily a tax collecting body (Kennedy, 2004). The government then no longer sought after peoples’ security or moral upbringing but rather pursued its own stability and wealth. In time, as the caliphate continually dismantled into numerous successor states ruled by various dynasties such as the Buwayhids, Seljuks, Uqaylids and Marwanids amidst others, the citizens gained political independence (Kennedy, 2004). Each successor state was faced with internal conflicts which deterred it from ensuring assertive control over the population. In Iraq and Iran for example, although the Buwayhid takeover in the 10th century was initially firm due to strong militia and familial ties, soon sources of conflict erupted (Kennedy, 2004). Firstly, the question of succession to the principalities arose. The Buwayhids considered the entire state as a possession of the family so relatives often interfered with each other to ensure the land stayed in the families’ possession (Kennedy, 2004). Since there was no distinct mode of inheritance, this also opened doors for princes tied to the dynasty by marriage to take over the land, resulting in contention. Secondly, although the rich lands of Iraq served as plenty of “Iqta land” as a source of revenue for troops, there was chaos over its distribution because of ongoing conflict between the Turkish and Daylamite soldiers (Kennedy, 2004). Immersed in its own internal conflict, the Buwayhid government and its like failed to be a firm, all-embracing Islamic polity, giving opportunities for citizens to look to each other for patronage.

This political independence was coupled with social unity in order to produce the fruits of the Renaissance. The social unity rose from two interconnected facets, namely a sense of ideological coherence of a diverse populace and the stability of the civil system at the grassroots level. The multitudes of people were held together in a cohesive unit due to a sense of ideological unity. Firstly, with the declaration of Islam as their religion, they found commonality despite differing sects (Abdullah, 2012e). With Islam, the most important product was the “Shariah” or the Islamic law which due to its universality diffused the peoples’ differences to an extent. The Shariah, as Hodgson (1974) describes it became a civic force due to public loyalty to Islam and its legitimacy. Having one code of law across the land meant that travelers could move from one region of the empire to another without interference of the government (Kennedy, 2004). This freedom of movement opened avenues for various cultures to intermingle. Travelers such as Ibn Hawqal, al-Muqaddasi and al-Biruni (who wrote “Kitabul Hind” documenting Indian customs) moved across the lands to explore intricate cultures (Ikram, 1964). With these travels, translations of books from Sanskrit, Greek, Persian and other languages to Arabic on various subjects ranging from medicine, philosophy, astrology to astronomy was undertaken (Lkram, 1964). One particular example of this intermingling is the influence of Indian traditions on the development Sufism or Islamic mysticism. This current of Islam emphasized deep contemplation and commitment to one’s spiritual self. It stood out as a miracle of the time influenced by Hindu practices spreading across the Islamic world from Iraq, Iran to Syria, against a background of continual dismay (Abdullah, 2012b). Beyond India, famous individuals like the philosopher Ibn Sina, the historiographer al-Masudi and the poet al-Muntabbi further shaped this movement with their unique contributions (Kennedy, 2004). Such rich developments were only possible as travelers moved about freely, yielding the Shariah as their protection and emblem of unity.

Secondly, another aspect of this ideological coherence that glued the community together was the use of the Arabic language in the state, from the administration to the commoners (Abdullah, 2012c). Kennedy (2004) highlights this point, stating, “As in the medieval West… the common language led to the creation of bonds between bureaucrats in different states and a common bureaucratic culture.” Lastly, the recognition of the theory of caliphate served as a unifying impetus for the society. Although the power of the caliph had long ago disintegrated, usurped by military commanders of various dynasties, he was still seen as a sign of political legitimacy (Kennedy, 2004). Despite various dynasties establishing themselves, no one claimed absolute independence (Kennedy, 2004). Rather, they would use the caliph to acquire legitimacy for rule in a particular region. Notably, the Buwayhids who were Shi’te still recognized Sunni caliphs despite differing beliefs, and paid allegiance to them in Friday sermons (Abdullah, 2012a). Such common threads connecting the population materialized themselves as aspects of non-political unity which lead to stability at the local level.

The diversity of the population rose due to immense conversion especially in Egypt and Syria and this diversity, in itself also contributed to the cultural growth and enlightenment. As non-Muslims converted, common Arab linkages were weakened since new converts demanded they be included in the political system. These non-Arab personalities penetrated the administration creating a sense of tolerance and understanding amidst the people. These conversions led in some cases to sharp differences between communities due to differing social and geographical backgrounds, creating sects in the empire (Kennedy, 2004). But they also gave rise to a rich diversity of perspectives. Due to these differences, vast cultural and scientific accomplishments were reached. In Egypt and Syria for example, with the establishment of the Fatimid Empire in the 9th century, a prominent Isamilite Shi’te movement rose amidst the Sunni populace (Kennedy, 2004). Despite the stark split between the two sects, Egypt did not turn into a bloodbath. However as this very division between Sunni and Shi’te doctrines became more pronounced, it simultaneously produced an array of important theological writing and debate (Kennedy, 2004). For example in 1029 CE, al-Risala al-Qadiriyya was published by the Sunni Abbasid caliph al-Qadir criticizing the Mu’tazila and Shi’te theology (Abdullah, 2012a). Writings such as these not only encouraged debate but also clarified differences between sects.

Farther west, in North Africa under the Murabitun dynasty, “literacy in the Arabic script and the custom of authorship in the Arabic language” developed (Norris & Chelmata, 2012). Later under the Muwahiddun dynasty in the 12th century, cultural reform arose. Founded by Ibn Tumart, this movement justified its liberalism on the works of al-Ghazali, a prominent Sufi theologian and thus opened ways for philosophical thought in the region (Shatzmiller, 2012). Philosophers such as Ibn Tufayl and Ibn Rushd flourished during this period amidst others who expanded on poetry, history, geography and the sciences (Shatzmiller, 2012). A unique literary tradition evolved particularly due to the contacts between regions of Muwahiddun occupation from Spain to North Africa (Shatzmiller, 2012). Beyond literature, Muwahiddun palaces adopted Hispano-Moorish techniques in architecture and were built by Spanish craftsmen.

In Spain, literature and architecture provides further evidence of the merging of cultures and the fruits that diversity can yield. During the reign of al-Hakam II in the 10th century, Spain became the “ornament of the world” with the rise of philosophical and literary centers (Torres Balbas, Levi-Provencal, & Latham, 2012). Spanish art, for example in the making of caskets and jars of ivory featured unique Arabesque designs. This was a distinct form of decoration imaging abstract, geometric designs printed on books, textiles and carpets (Abdullah, 2012f). Despite differences, the merging of a diverse people developed a flourishing cultural mosaic.

Fortifying this diverse group of people was a stable civil society. Two important aspects of social unity were the A’yan system of civil administration and the Futuwwa clubs (Abdullah, 2012e). The A’yan known as “men of influence” were leaders or notables of high ranks in neighborhoods across the Middle East (Abdullah, 2012c). They were either merchants who provided financial support, descendents of a noble lineage such as “Sharifs” (descendents of the Prophet) or men of knowledge or “ulama” who served as religious authorities in the community (Abdullah, 2012d). These notables were usually property owning families who exercised control over the local market and mosque in the town. They addressed issues of the commoners and acted as mediators in disputes. Since the masses supported these notables, they gained political significance and used their power to ensure the “Amir” or governor of the province responded to the needs of the inhabitants (Bowen, 2012).

Coupled with this system was a less formal organization of youth groups into “Futuwwah” clubs (Abdullah, 2012e). These clubs brought together youth involved in a common trade or profession who represented the poor, down trodden parts of the nation and sought to speak up against the rich and powerful (Abdullah, 2012e). Their aim was to bring civic discipline to the towns and they were held together through an unconditional sense of loyalty towards one another. Thus at the grassroots level, there was an independent, stable society having strong links with each other which held out in the face of hardship.

This contrast between the division of government and the unity of society and culture thus erupted into a period of cultural enlightenment and development. The dissolution of empires was a period of chaos where society was dismantled, as seen in the example of the fall of the Roman Empire. With the decline of the Abbasids, surely there was economic and social instability in areas such as Baghdad, Iraq, and Syria but nevertheless it was also a period of enlightenment (Kennedy, 2004). This enlightenment arose from a sense of nonpolitical unity triggered due to the fracturing of the state. The fragmentation ensured political independence for the people. With the spread of Islam, a diverse population arose, unified by a sense of ideological unity based on their religion, language and common allegiance to the caliphate. Coupled with this was a solid social foundation established by the A’yan civil administration and the Futuwwa clubs on the commoner level. Thus with social stability and political independence, a diverse population merged to produce a period of intellectual growth and development, despite ravaging conflict and division on the forefront.


Abdullah, T.A.J. (2012a, January). The Islamic Middle Ages: Iraq & Iran. [Lecture]. York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Abdullah, T.A.J. (2012b, January). Sufi Islam. [Lecture]. York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Abdullah, T.A.J. (2012c, January). The Political System in an Age of Division. [Lecture]. York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Abdullah, T.A.J. (2012d, February). India and Central Asia. [Lecture]. York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Abdullah, T.A.J. (2012e, February). Society and Economics in the Middle Ages I. [Lecture]. York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Abdullah, T.A.J. (2012f, March). Literature, Music, Art and Architecture. [Lecture]. York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Bowen, H. (2012). A’yān. In P. Bearman, T. Bianquis, C.E. Bosworth, E. van Donzel, & W.P. Heinrichs (eds.), Encyclopaedia of Islam, Second Edition. Brill Online. Retrieved March 24, 2012, from

Hodgson, M. G. S. (1974). The Venture of Islam, Volume II: The Classical Age of Islam. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Retrieved from;idno=heb00894.0002.001;cc=acls.

Ikram, S.M. (1964). Muslim Civilization in India. New York: Columbia University Press. Retrieved from

Kennedy, H. (2004). The Prophet and the Age of the Caliphates. Toronto: Pearson Longman.

Norris, H.T., & Chalmeta, P. (2012). al-Murābiṭūn. In P. Bearman, T. Bianquis, C.E. Bosworth, E. van Donzel, & W.P. Heinrichs (eds.), Encyclopaedia of Islam, Second Edition. Brill Online. Retrieved March 26, 2012, from

Schimmel, A. (1992). Islam An Introduction. Albany: State University of New York Press.

Shatzmiller, M. (2012). al-Muwaḥḥidūn. In P. Bearman, T. Bianquis, C.E. Bosworth, E. van Donzel, & W.P. Heinrichs (eds.), Encyclopaedia of Islam, Second Edition. Brill Online. Retrieved March 25, 2012, from

Torres Balbás, L., Lévi-Provençal, E., & Latham, J.D. (2012). al-Andalus or Ḏj̲azīrat al-Andalus. In P. Bearman, T. Bianquis, C.E. Bosworth, E. van Donzel, & W.P. Heinrichs (eds.), Encyclopaedia of Islam, Second Edition. Brill Online. Retrieved March 26, 2012, from